Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Special Forces > Special Forces Questions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-05-2005, 11:04   #16
cback0220
Quiet Professional
 
cback0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fayettenam
Posts: 142
Actually

Your recruiter is not giving you the runaround. The change happened on October first. I actually had to hustle to get down there before then in order to enlist before that day. Still though I had to have an interview with a colonel from the recruiting command. They said that the washout rate among 17-18-19 year olds was getting pretty high and they wanted to stop that. Another thing that they want is some college education. So unless all of San Diego's recruituing district is giving me the runaround it changed
cback0220 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 19:05   #17
dave411
Asset
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by cback0220
Your recruiter is not giving you the runaround. The change happened on October first. I actually had to hustle to get down there before then in order to enlist before that day. Still though I had to have an interview with a colonel from the recruiting command. They said that the washout rate among 17-18-19 year olds was getting pretty high and they wanted to stop that. Another thing that they want is some college education. So unless all of San Diego's recruituing district is giving me the runaround it changed
Thanks for the info.
__________________
"Knowledge is Power"
dave411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2005, 15:15   #18
Drew5337
Asset
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: MO
Posts: 5
I spoke with a recruiter today about this. He said the age requirement had gone up, though he did not know to what. He thought it was 21. I am 24, so no biggie for me, but I am not too suprised at the change. Yet another recruiter I sat down with today (who unfortunatly looks like will be my main guy) didn't even know what 18x was. He asked what kinds of jobs I was interested in, and I said 18x, and got a dumbfounded look Great........
Drew5337 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2005, 15:09   #19
Leozinho
Quiet Professional
 
Leozinho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: No. Va
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by cback0220
They said that the washout rate among 17-18-19 year olds was getting pretty high and they wanted to stop that. Another thing that they want is some college education.
I don't know about changes to the 18x contract, but I can offer anecdotal evidence (from going through SOPC 1 and 2 and being part of two different Q course classes) that 18 and 19 year olds don't do well in the course.

My original SOPC class is finishing up the Q course right about now. We started out with tons of 18 year olds, but not many of them made it. I think that the biggest reason many failed is that these guys had never lived away from Mom and had never had to assume any kind of responsibility before joining.

For the most part they didn't have the maturity or discipline. They stay out late and then sleep through formation the next day. (I did that too when I was 19, but the difference is that you don't get kicked out of college for sleeping through class. It's very likely you will get kicked out of Student Co for things like that.)

On a jump, while under canopy, a fellow pulled out of his pocket a little toy action figure with a mini-parachute and released it. It drifted right over all the cadre. Guess how old he was? 19.

A few Echo classes back 8 guys got caught with cell phones on the main field training exercise. It was no suprise to me that 7 out of 8 were X-Rays, and mostly younger ones. They couldn't go 14 days without talking to their girlfriends in high school, I guess. You just don't see E-5s from the 82nd willing to jeopardize their careers over a couple of phone calls.

On the other hand, the older X-rays - the E-4 with degrees, and there are a lot of them in the course - succeed at a much higher rate, from my limited observation. I am not saying that a college degree helps in the course, but it shows that one has spent 4 or 5 years in the (semi) real world and has grown up a bit.

Another factor is that the 18 x-rays that came in as E-4s (I'll call them E-4s rather than college boys) are more "focused" on SF, and in a sense have more to lose if they quit. They gave up, or turned down, better paying civilian jobs for a shot at SF. Or they turned down OCS, preferring to enlist and try to go straight to SF. All of the E-4s I talked to said that they would not have joined had it not been for the chance to be SF. So in a sense they are less cavalier than the younger guys. (I'm not saying they don't want to be SF for the wrong reasons, or that they aren't deluded about exactly what SF is, because many are. That's a different subject.) Contrast that with an 18 year old that is going to enlist anyway and the recruiter talks him into an 18x-ray contract, and guess which one is more likely to quit in SFAS.

Never mind the degree, a 24 year old that has been living on his own and supporting himself for 4 years seems to be more likely to finish the course.

Lest anyone think I have it out for young guys, let me add that there are more than a few 18 year olds that are squared away, and there are 26 year olds with degrees who gave up good jobs that are sh*tbags and quitters. And remember, the 18 year olds that eventually make it will be closer to 21 by the time they make it to a team.

Rant over. (If you couldn't guess, I'm one of the oldest guys in my class.)

Edited to correct spelling.

Last edited by Leozinho; 10-22-2005 at 15:29.
Leozinho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005, 13:35   #20
Warrior-Mentor
Quiet Professional
 
Warrior-Mentor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: America, the Beautiful
Posts: 3,193
Resurrecting info from the flip side of this discussion...

Saw the age analysis from the Special Ops Recruiting Company Commander.
It was age vs grad at SFAS...

Showed 18 yr olds had lowest, with it steadily improving to age 22, where it plateau'd to age 28, then a slight drop..and an increase to age 32. The chart stopped at age 32.

The increases over age 28 are somewhat artificial as it was a percentage and there only 1-2 guys that age, but they made it...

Good news for the old guys.

Do a search for the thread Oldest SF Candidate

Best of luck,
JM
Warrior-Mentor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005, 18:21   #21
Leozinho
Quiet Professional
 
Leozinho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: No. Va
Posts: 407
Sir,l

My guess is that the difference in success rate between the young and the older would be even greater it was measured by completion of Q Course, rather than SFAS, as a lot of the mistakes that I saw the younger guys make occurred after Selection.

(Again, this is based purely on my limited observations.)

Now if you factor in the injury rate, we old guys may not perform so well.
Leozinho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2005, 18:30   #22
QRQ 30
Quiet Professional
 
QRQ 30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Williamston, SC
Posts: 2,018
I have seen some interesting comments here but the original question is useless. USARREC has a web site and I am sure you can get the answer from the horses mouth. We heroes, past, present and future can tell you what we think we know but it is best to get the info from proper sources. If you think an answer is not accurate take it up the ladder and not to the latrine for the latrine lawyers (polite term) to mull over.
__________________
Whale

Pain and suffering are inevitable,
misery is optional.

http://tadahling.com/memoriesofaspecialforcessoldier/
QRQ 30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies