|
This is the very definition of a good idea fairy.
What they’ve failed to take into account is that there are different levels of commercial relationship:
- Transactional
- Employee / Team Member
- Partnership
Considering the military is pretty much the only institution that can say, “this operation has a level of acceptable losses…”, I think we can agree that the US Army’s relationship with its personnel falls somewhere between Team Member and Partnership.
However, the kind of thinking that produced this “bid” idea is very much transactional.
I’m imagining this was invented by a senior officer who hasn’t been near a combat arms unit for quite a while, hasn’t been at the coal face at all for some time, and who has forgotten the Army’s core values and what leadership actually means.
But my real concern is: how the hell did a truly stupid idea like this get signed off by multiple levels of leadership?
But I guess creating resentment in your staff might be the new leadership doctrine coming out of Harvard or something. Facepalm
S
__________________
"Do not pray for easy lives. Pray to be stronger men! Do not pray for tasks equal to your powers. Pray for power equal to your tasks."
-- Phillip Brooks
"A man's reach should exceed his grasp"
-- Robert Browning
"Hooah! Pushing thru the shit til Daisies grow, Sir"
-- Me
"Malo mori quam foedari"
"Death before Dishonour"
-- Family Coat-of-Arms Maxim
"Mārohirohi! Kia Kaha!"
"Be strong! Drive-on!"
-- Māori saying
Last edited by Scimitar; 02-23-2026 at 00:19.
|