Quote:
Originally posted by Team Sergeant
DF,
I would not use that scenario and their mistakes as a learning aid. Hell unless you were there you’ve no idea what really went on.
As far as why you are dead, making HF comms behind enemy lines is a risky business. Unless you are a trained communications professional I would refrain from making any communications comments or suggestions. Get some training or read up on DFing of HF equipment.
TS
|
I'm ALWAYS humble when ,,judging'' another's mission, for the reason you told me.'this is to easy'.
I could association a 'yes but' with everything I said.
Again, I can say: if tey had made a radio check just before the mission, they would had comms.But again if I emitt I risq to be monitored. It was 1991 and I dont think the burst system was really used by the SAS, and defenitely not by Iraq.I know for Canadian Forces, in 1993 it took about 48 hours to do a complete electronic map at the division level.That was not so fast.A short check at the base, prior to embarkment, or a back-up frequencies 'twin' list would, I think, have been secure in the perspective of electronic warfare.
The same way we test weapons prior to a mission, the same way we should test the comms, which is, in a sense, a weapon.
But to give bad comms instructions to a LRP is unforgivable.Comms mean life.
I'm just trying some mental acrobatics, some brainstorming.It often comes with good points.
Threaded Mode
