Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > At Ease > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-04-2004, 23:00   #46
brownapple
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by mffjm8509

3) Do away with the current rank structure and adobt a GS level that promotes those worthy of leadership responsiblity at the unit level, and removes it from DA. This way company, battalion, and group commander could select the best qualified men to be in charge. Everyone else could perform thier function, and remain there if they so choose. This way, no more punching tickets to get promoted.....Commanders could select those who can perform today. A former Battalion Commander of mine wrote a paper at the War College with a similar suggestion for Jr commanders. I think this concept would be well adopted to all on the team.
Why not just get rid of the "up or out" policy for all of the Army? It doesn't do anybody any good... not SF, not Infantry... nobody.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2004, 23:38   #47
mffjm8509
Quiet Professional
 
mffjm8509's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 581
Quote:
Originally posted by Greenhat
Why not just get rid of the "up or out" policy for all of the Army? It doesn't do anybody any good... not SF, not Infantry... nobody.
Hmm,

As I look around my group I can see guys that should not be representative of Special Forces. So, I dont think "up or out" is the way I'd look at it.....at some level, someone needs to be looking out for the force.

I do belive that SOME individuals could perform at thier current level within group, (myself included) without further promotion and continue to be an asset to the force. However, at some level there MUST be a monitor that looks objectivly at perfomance to determine if individuals continue to contribute to the operational groups, or if they are better served in another capacity, or even retired.

...I stilll belive that Group, Battalion, anc Company Commanders should be empowered with the ability to determine who shows leadership potential (unlike all Infantry CSMs, which sat on the last MSG board). and select those individuals for promotion to the next level......Who is better to evaluate and reward performance?

we do it for Warrant Officers, why not for Team Sergeants & Sergeants Major?

mp
__________________
v/r

MDP

"May God be with you and may the devil be crushed underfoot as you march for peace on the skulls of our enemies, for goodwill, security and a quality of life that comes only with democracy, " - Ted Nugent
mffjm8509 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2004, 04:59   #48
BMT (RIP)
Quiet Professional
 
BMT (RIP)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Red State
Posts: 3,774
Better Crank It Up, Boss

I have heard these same ideas and arguements since Sep. '64. The old ASA controlled their promotions.

BMT
Jr. FOG
__________________
Don't mess with old farts...age and treachery will always overcome youth and skill! Bullshit and brilliance only come with age and experience.
BMT (RIP) is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Labor Unions Roguish Lawyer General Discussions 27 05-17-2011 10:37



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies