Feinsteins Gun Control Bill

[Javadrinker]

Originally Posted by ddoering

I thought this was obvious.

it was and is

[cat in the hat]

of course she stares at goats.
every morning when she looks into the mirror to shave.
(notice the lack of pink font)

Originally Posted by Javadrinker

I was referring back to when the mayor of San Fran was shot and she ran out and got the only concealed carry permit in SF, and I thought it was common knowledge that she did stare at goats ...

[Pete]

Giffords' husband pulls dog off sea lion in Calif.

http://www.charter.net/news/read.php....org%3E&ps=931

"LAGUNA BEACH, Calif. (AP) — Amateur video shows former astronaut Mark Kelly, the husband of former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, yanking away a dog that clamped down on a baby sea lion at a California beach.

Laguna Beach police tell the Los Angeles Times ( lat.ms/YQATM5) the attack happened near an exclusive resort Saturday......................"

The Giffords. Strange news just swirls around them.

That little dog has killed more baby seals than my assault rifle has.

And the PETA protests will start in .....................

[SF18C]

I NEED to borrow that ^

thanks Pete!

[MiTTMedic]

Link to the video, if you want:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9dd0KwnpKU

The video was a little grusome, but the comments are priceless. 'bout time for this family to disappear from the public eye for awhile. Of course, the media will hide the fact that it was HIS dog & make him look like a hero.

[Pete]

Hmm, Pit Bull

Now why would that family want to own a Pitt Bull? They don't need a Pit Bull. Look, it kills baby seals. What sane person would even need one - the police are there to protect you - just dial 911.

Just imagine that Pit Bull free in a class of first graders - shaking and mauling them like the baby seal.

Oh, yeah, they'd claim their "little baby" wouldn't hurt a fly but look what it did to that seal baby.

If it would save just one..........

[MiTTMedic]

As one of the video comments mentioned...imagine the media frenzy if this was Ted Nugent's pitbull.....

[PSM]

It turns out background checks that Mark Kelly claimed don't work actually do work. The owner of Diamondback Police Supply has decided to not sell Mark Kelly the AR-15.

Statement of Douglas MacKinlay, Owner/President, Diamondback Police
Supply Co., Inc.

“While I support and respect Mark Kelly’s 2nd Amendment rights to purchase, possess, and use firearms in a safe and responsible manner, his recent statements to the media made it clear that his intent in purchasing the Sig Sauer M400 5.56mm rifle from us was for reasons other then for his personal use. In light of this fact, I determined that it was in my company’s best interest to terminate this transaction prior to his returning to my store to complete the Federal From 4473 and NICS background check required of Mr. Kelly before he could take possession this firearm. A full refund was sent to Mr. Kelly, via express mail, on Thursday of last week.

The Sig Sauer rifle will be donated to the Arizona Tactical Officers Association where it will be raffled off to generate funds the association can use to purchase much needed tactical equipment for the organization’s members. The A.T.O. A. represents the SWAT and Special Response officers of the state’s law enforcement community who regularly place their lives on the line to protect the residents of this state.

Additionally, Diamondback Police Supply will make a $1295.00 contribution (the selling price of the M400 rifle) to the Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program that teaches children, in pre-K through 3rd grade, four important steps to take if they find a gun. The emphasis of the program is on child safety, something that is important to all of us and at the core of the current debate on gun control,” stated Douglas MacKinlay, Owner/President, Diamondback Police Supply Co., Inc.

Read more: http://www.knst.com/cc-common/news/s...#ixzz2Of5NUW4l

Take that, Space Cadet!

Pat

[Stiletto11]

He doesn't need more than one square of toilet paper either.

[Dusty]

Originally Posted by Pete

Hmm, Pit Bull

Now why would that family want to own a Pitt Bull? They don't need a Pit Bull. Look, it kills baby seals. What sane person would even need one - the police are there to protect you - just dial 911.

Just imagine that Pit Bull free in a class of first graders - shaking and mauling them like the baby seal.

Oh, yeah, they'd claim their "little baby" wouldn't hurt a fly but look what it did to that seal baby.

If it would save just one..........

Ask Swatsurgeon how he deals with pit bulls.

[Pete]

http://www.capwiz.com/gunowners/issu...ertid=62590241

Don't Let Your Senator Deceive You
His or her vote IN FAVOR OF S. 649 was VERY significant

“The Senate's dramatic filibuster-busting vote Thursday to move forward on a gun-safety bill is being cast as a historic breakthrough, testing the strength of the gun lobby and opening a door to the first major gun-control law since 1994. It means President Obama will get the votes on gun legislation he has been seeking since a shooting rampage in Newtown, Conn.”
- USA Today, April 12, 2013

It’s not often that we agree with USA Today. But author, Gregory Korte, got it right in Friday’s column. The Senators who refused to cast a “no” vote on Thursday - and who refused to drive a stake through the heart of S. 649 - have given the President a key symbolic victory..........................."

&



"....................In addition, it would, in section 117, explicitly waive federal privacy laws in order to allow private doctors to send the names of persons with PTSD, ADHD, and postpartum depression to the FBI – thereby unilaterally banning them from owning guns...................."

Told ya' so.

SEC. 117. CLARIFICATION THAT SUBMISSION OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS TO THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM IS NOT PROHIBITED BY THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT.
Information collected under section 102(c)(3) of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) to assist the Attorney General in enforcing section 922(g)(4) of title 18, United States Code, shall not be subject to the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note).

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by Pete

Told ya' so.

SEC. 117. CLARIFICATION THAT SUBMISSION OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORDS TO THE NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECK SYSTEM IS NOT PROHIBITED BY THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT.
Information collected under section 102(c)(3) of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (18 U.S.C. 922 note) to assist the Attorney General in enforcing section 922(g)(4) of title 18, United States Code, shall not be subject to the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (42 U.S.C. 1320d-2 note).

Yep. And you can't sit down with your friend at your home, or anywhere, and swap or sell - sorry, family members only, sorta.

Ever notice how they always start these bills with the 'stick' for the states, i.e., if you don't play ball here are the escalating rates at which you'll forfeit some grant money (that we got you dependent on, mwhahahaha).

Take notes of the votes.

[Go Devil]

We have moved beyond counting;
It's time to start culling.

This collectivist march is not going to be stopped by voting.


They own all forms of mass media and the ballot box.

[Badger52]

Originally Posted by Go Devil

This collectivist march is not going to be stopped by voting.

Nope; noting the tally is like Santa makin' his list.

[Dusty]

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner...show-some-guts