Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > UWOA > Terrorism

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-04-2009, 08:10   #16
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,822
What is the purpose of immigration, assuming that we are not looking for some sort of liberal multicultural Coke commercial utopia?

If we have an adequate labor pool, it would seem to me that immigration should be severely limited, if not closed. Those we do permit to immigrate should fill a niche and meet a need that we have. If you have no skills, do not speak the language, and have no desire to be productive and assimilate into the melting pot, why do we need to bring you here?

Anyone with an opposition to living peacefully under the laws and societal mores of this country and becoming productive members of society is unlikely to be an asset. Why bring them here?

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 09:51   #17
SF-TX
Quiet Professional
 
SF-TX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reaper View Post
Anyone with an opposition to living peacefully under the laws and societal mores of this country and becoming productive members of society is unlikely to be an asset. Why bring them here?

TR
Indeed, why?
__________________
Ubi libertas habitat ibi nostra patria est

I hold it as a principle that the duration of peace is in direct proportion to the slaughter you inflict on the enemy. –Gen. Mikhail Skobelev
SF-TX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 14:47   #18
nmap
Area Commander
 
nmap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,760
As we consider bringing in additional people, perhaps we should consider the issue of jobs. I came across some information that may be of interest -

LINK

Scroll down about 1/3 of the way. You will notice a chart - the second one from the top. The chart shows that the number of people not in the labor force has increased without a single reversal since 1999.

Highly skilled individuals may be worth bringing in. But the masses? We cannot take care of our own. We certainly cannot provide for additional individuals.
__________________
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero

Acronym Key:

MOO: My Opinion Only
YMMV: Your Mileage May Vary
ETF: Exchange Traded Fund


Oil Chart

30 year Treasury Bond
nmap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 15:50   #19
blacksmoke
Like My Mankini?
 
blacksmoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: OH for now
Posts: 437
45,000 Somalians in central Ohio, with a total population of 1.2 million. Not too bad.....YET.
blacksmoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 16:00   #20
greenberetTFS
Quiet Professional (RIP)
 
greenberetTFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Carriere,Ms.
Posts: 6,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacksmoke View Post
45,000 Somalians in central Ohio, with a total population of 1.2 million. Not too bad.....YET.
45,000,you've got to be $h*ting me................. How many are collecting money from us because their unable to work? This has got to stop......

Big Teddy
__________________
I believe that SF is a 'calling' - not too different from the calling missionaries I know received. I knew instantly that it was for me, and that I would do all I could to achieve it. Most others I know in SF experienced something similar. If, as you say, you HAVE searched and read, and you do not KNOW if this is the path for you --- it is not....
Zonie Diver

SF is a calling and it requires commitment and dedication that the uninitiated will never understand......
Jack Moroney

SFA M-2527, Chapter XXXVII
greenberetTFS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 17:55   #21
Plutarch
Auxiliary
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by blacksmoke View Post
45,000 Somalians in central Ohio, with a total population of 1.2 million. Not too bad.....YET.
Yet being the operative word. If they turn militant, you won't be able to catch a cab in this town.

Seriously though, there are areas in Columbus where you are the odd man out if you are not Somali.
Plutarch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 11:44   #22
Defender968
SF Candidate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Astounding.

You forgot to use the pink text - I hope - otherwise you left off a few of the races of the ffolkes normally included under such 'pretty simple' thinking.

Richard
Very Respectfully Richard I said nothing about, nor made any mention of or even the allusion to race what-so-ever. I spoke of country of origin alone, though one could extrapolate that to also mean religion within the context of my post and I'm ok with that, but not race as race has nothing to do with this discussion.

Now what I said was in the context of ideologies that hate the US, what it stands for, and that wish to see our and it's destruction. I have nothing against any race, religion, or nationality, so long as they want to peacefully coexist with us, if they don't want to peacefully coexist then I have sworn an oath to defend this nation from them. Some people may choose to believe the majority of Islam is not hostile towards the west, that is their right, I however do not necessarily hold that same opinion, and that is my right, as it is my duty to look for threats to the US. There are plenty of good Muslims who are peaceful, but it is nearly impossible to tell the difference between a good one and a bad one for the sake of this discussion. Those countries and/or the inhabitants of the countries I mentioned (and they're not the only ones by any stretch) have made it very clear by their actions that they do not wish to coexist with us. I maintain that we should not allow people to immigrate from countries who openly state they wish to see the west destroyed without extremely extenuating circumstances, and only then if the person can be reasonably determined to be of use to our country and not a threat.

From a failed nation state like Somalia, I would argue there are probably not
75 K people that fit the above description. Are there 75 K decent people in Somalia, I'm sure there are, I would hope that Somalis love their children the same way we do (though what I've seen of Muslims in the middle east does make me questions even that) the point is given their lack of education their potential to be useful as productive citizens is limited and the reality is we can't afford to take the risk to just let everyone in. Many of those people could be great Americans, maybe, but they could just as easily be great jihadists, and in a failed nation state like Somalia can we really do a thorough background check? If we're going out looking for poor, uneducated individuals to let into the country (which is what you're going to get out of Somalia predominantly) why not go looking in South America, at least then we have a better chance that they have not been indoctrinated by Radical Islam to blow themselves up once inside the country.

As I said before I would argue we should be allowing ONLY people who have skills we need into the US like doctors, nurses, priests, etc. I apologize if that sounds racist, or radical to you, but if you look at the immigration policies of many other countries, many only allow people in that they need, so why is it so bad if the US does the same?

Currently it appears to me we are allowing, if not encouraging our country to be invaded a little at a time, how long can we continue to do so before it's not our country anymore not to mention the terrorism threat inhearant to letting those people in? In times past immigrants came to this country to BE Americans, they came here to be a part of the amazing thing that is the United State, they assimilated and worked towards their dreams, and in doing so they strengthened this nation. I would argue that is no longer the case, if it were I wouldn't have to press 1 for English, and Mexico's 2nd biggest source of foreign capital wouldn't be remittance from the US (that's 2nd only to oil revenues by the way). People are coming here now to get what they can from the gravy train but have no loyalty to this country. That’s why we’ve seen an exodus of immigrants now that the jobs are drying up, why because they were never here for the long haul. If they were here for the long haul with our congress and president they wouldn't leave as they’re probably going to get amnesty and become citizens if they stuck around (that is if they choose to become citizens, which I am convinced most will not because then they would have to pay taxes)

So why are they leaving then? It's because they were never here for the right reasons to begin with IMO.

Just my .02
Defender968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 15:57.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies