Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > The Pipeline (Special Forces Training) > 18A

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-30-2010, 17:28   #1
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,822
My understanding was that with Walter Reed on the BRAC list, they had cut the funding for maintenance to the bone.

IMHO, the hospital CO took one for the team.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2010, 06:50   #2
troy2k
Quiet Professional
 
troy2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 65
Walter Reed...

... from my understanding, had an institutional issue, borne of a mentality I can only call "wrong."
My friend, a double amputee still on a team (just so you can base the type of person I am talking about), was there. Recovering from his surgeries, bed-ridden, he was ordered to formation the next day, lest he be called AWOL. This was the norm for daily business, not the exception.
The idea that this was an institutional issue is further borne out by the fact that after the MD (a general officer of course) in charge of WR was fired, he was replaced by the first Non-MD GO to command WR in its history. They wanted to change the paradigm.

Speaking to Afghanistan:
Quote:
The replacement of McKiernan reminds us that senior leaders have prerogative to build the team they feel is best suited to execute the selected strategy.
How troubling is it then that the replacement for McKiernan was fired as well? What must have gone through Petraus's head when he got that phone call? In my mind this speaks to more than just the book answers for why these GOs were relieved of duty.
__________________
“Creating effective intelligence is an inherent and essential responsibility of command. Intelligence failures are failures of command – [just] as operations failures are command failures.” Marine Corps Doctrine Publication 2 - Intelligence
troy2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:10.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies