Go Back   Professional Soldiers ® > Special Forces Weapons > Weapons Discussion Area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-10-2010, 15:22   #1
Koa18B
Asset
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ft. Campbell/ Ft. Bragg
Posts: 38
We are supposedly using this in the Summer?

http://www.popsci.com/technology/art...-weapon-battle

Saw this article has anyone heard about it or field tested it out other then the soldier from some ACR ?
__________________
People hang on his every word, even the prepositions. He could disarm you with his looks... or his hands, either way. He can speak French in Russian. He is the most interesting man in the world.
Koa18B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 18:11   #2
mark46th
Quiet Professional
 
mark46th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange, Ca.
Posts: 4,950
If each round ensured a hit or near hit on an enemy, it would be money well spent. IIRC, during the Vietnam War, something like 1 out of 50,000 rounds hit an enemy...
mark46th is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 21:30   #3
rdret1
Quiet Professional
 
rdret1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wilson,NC
Posts: 1,506
And we thought the M-4's were cool when we got them. They are only good to 500M though?
__________________
"Solitude is strength; to depend on the presence of the crowd is weakness. The man who needs a mob to nerve him is much more alone than he imagines."

~ Paul Brunton (1898-1981)



R.D. Winters
rdret1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 22:17   #4
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,824
Another leftover from the OICW fiasco.

The warhead lacks lethality, unless it goes off in the barrel as it did during testing.

Too heavy, too expensive, and eats very heavy batteries like a mofo.

I do not see SF using this.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 20:36   #5
Mississippi10
Quiet Professional
 
Mississippi10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Crockett, Texas
Posts: 8
The warhead is going to take few seconds to get downrange, and it's very seldom going to cause even a disabling injury to anyone more than six or seven meters from point of detonation. The bad guys over in the sandbox have lots of bad qualities, but total stupidity isn't one of them; they're going to figure out pretty quick to pop up, shoot, pop back down and move ten meters to one side or the other. This is even assuming that the system works as advertised. Back in the late, great, Southeast Asia wargames, we were given some experimental M-79 rounds which (on a vacant parking lot) bounced and detonated in the air a few fractions of a second later. On dirt or vegetation they just bounced.
Mississippi10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 23:46   #6
geardo211
Asset
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Ft Benning, GA
Posts: 10
Sounds like a solution in need of a problem. Aren't most engagements in Afghanistan beyond 500m anyway? Why are we buying plasma rifles in 40w range, when the money could be used to refit our current equipment? I know I would appreciate it more if everyone in my squad had a PAQ4/PEQ15, and M4's that still had some finish left on them. JMO though.
__________________
So climb inside your metal coffins, with eye pro that you'll never need.
geardo211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 02:07   #7
Koa18B
Asset
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ft. Campbell/ Ft. Bragg
Posts: 38
I agree with everyone I do not see this as a tactically sound or efficient weapon for any team. It seems far to bulky and cumbersome.
__________________
People hang on his every word, even the prepositions. He could disarm you with his looks... or his hands, either way. He can speak French in Russian. He is the most interesting man in the world.
Koa18B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 02:50   #8
The Reaper
Quiet Professional
 
The Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Free Pineland
Posts: 24,824
The Army spent millions with HK to develop this, and it was an epic failure when it was killed ten years ago.

Looks like they are trying to recoup some of their losses by repackaging, renaming, and reissuing it.

TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910

De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
The Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 06:04   #9
LarryW
Area Commander
 
LarryW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Neck Virginia
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Looks like they are trying to recoup some of their losses by repackaging, renaming, and reissuing it.

TR
You're right about that, Sir. Expect the NDIA jockeys will never give up. Used car salesmen in plaid pants. Wait 'til the next "expo" and this round will be the best thing to come along since they tried to sell striped paint to the Navy.

There'll be PowerPoint slides, voice over narratives, free mousepads and pens...Can't wait...gets me all choked up just thinking about it.(sigh)
__________________
v/r,
LarryW
"Do not go gentle into that good night..."
LarryW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 09:20   #10
x SF med
Quiet Professional
 
x SF med's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: In transit somewhere
Posts: 4,044
A well trained 'natural' with an M203 or M79 can hit a window ... and have the round go off in the room... is there really a need for a laser?

Also, if you're close enough... you can throw a grenade into a window.


Spend the money on good equipment, training and food for the troops, not expensive BS that's going to make an arms company rich.
__________________
In the business of war, there is no invariable stategic advantage (shih) which can be relied upon at all times.
Sun-Tzu, "The Art of Warfare"

Hearing, I forget. Seeing, I remember. Writing (doing), I understand. Chinese Proverb

Too many people are looking for a magic bullet. As always, shot placement is the key. ~TR
x SF med is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 09:51   #11
dr. mabuse
Guerrilla Chief
 
dr. mabuse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: DFW area
Posts: 861
*
__________________
"The difference is that back then, we had the intestinal fortitude to do what we needed to in order to preserve our territorial sovereignty and to protect the citizens of this great country, and today, we do not." TR

"I attribute the little I know to my not having been ashamed to ask for information, and to my rule of conversing with all descriptions of men on those topics that form their own peculiar professions and pursuits." John Locke

Last edited by dr. mabuse; 05-17-2011 at 22:09.
dr. mabuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 10:27   #12
longrange1947
Quiet Professional
 
longrange1947's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Fayetteville NC
Posts: 3,533
The OCIW has been stripped into three separate possible weapon components and are again being pushed through such crap as "Weaponology" (sp?) shows, and other BS on Discovery and Military channels. They show guys in uniform shooting it and how great it is. It is similar to the so called .50 replacement that fires a similar round very fast and a computer sets each war head to detonate at a set location based o the sight and laser range finder. The operator can set point impact, delay, or proximity. I still have not seen an official test of any of them. H&K is really trying to salvage this one. I saw this crap in the early 90s and it did not work then and as far as I know does not work any better now.
__________________
Hold Hard guys

Rick B.

Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit.
Wisdom is knowing it is great on a hamburger but not so great sticking one up your ass.

Author - Richard.

Experience is what you get right after you need it.

Author unknown.
longrange1947 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 11:34   #13
Sinister
Quiet Professional
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 261
Each Program Manager - Small Arms (a full colonel) has to show he fielded a weapon to the Warfighter in Combat if he expects to make brigadier -- which is why none of these bad/stupid ideas dies.
Sinister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2010, 12:34   #14
EasyIan
Asset
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Between Raising Hell and Amazing Grace
Posts: 54
The cost of funding this weapon system could have (and should have) been used to begin re-phasing the M4 upper receiver with a piston impingement system. Like so many have already stated this system will prove to be ineffective in the field, and what it will accomplish can already be achieved by properly employing weapons already in use.
__________________
"The truth is I do not lose, however if it appears I have lost do not concede to the idea. It is merely a diversion that I may win with minimal effort while my enemy and his allies celebrate victory.”

Last edited by EasyIan; 05-22-2010 at 20:52.
EasyIan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 09:38   #15
mark46th
Quiet Professional
 
mark46th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orange, Ca.
Posts: 4,950
I have to agree with x-SF Med. An experienced M-79 user can be very accurate.
mark46th is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 16:21.



Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®
Site Designed, Maintained, & Hosted by Hilliker Technologies