01-19-2005, 07:32
|
#1
|
|
Asset
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 29
|
USERRA and the NG SF.
I guess my question is geared more for those who are currently serving in either the 19th or 20th groups.
I have read and heard that the optempo for those groups are pretty intense and I was wondering how this affects your jobs with your civilian employers. Rather difficult to ask alot of specifics without violating OPSEC, but do you find yourselves constantly playing catch up with your employers?
On the flip side, how did and do your civilian employers react to the fact that not only are you NG but also SF? Do you find them understanding or critical? I would love to hear from those experiencing this situation, as well as from the SF community as a whole.
Thanks in adavance for your time.
|
|
Rschoeneck is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 07:49
|
#2
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 266
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rschoeneck
I guess my question is geared more for those who are currently serving in either the 19th or 20th groups.
I have read and heard that the optempo for those groups are pretty intense and I was wondering how this affects your jobs with your civilian employers. Rather difficult to ask alot of specifics without violating OPSEC, but do you find yourselves constantly playing catch up with your employers?
On the flip side, how did and do your civilian employers react to the fact that not only are you NG but also SF? Do you find them understanding or critical? I would love to hear from those experiencing this situation, as well as from the SF community as a whole.
Thanks in adavance for your time.
|
It varies with employer on how this affects your job - some employers are very supportive and some really suck. If you work for one that sucks and you intend to stay in the guard then you either put up with it or find a new job. Of course you always have the option of becoming a "guard bum" with no real civilian job - just spend all your time working for the guard.
Most employers have no friggin idea what SF is so this doesn't matter. Of course if you feed them lines about being a "trained killer" they may think twice about screwing with your job. I've never had anyone be critical of SF to me (at least not to my face).
__________________
"Excretion is the bitter part of valor."
|
|
Jo Sul is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 08:04
|
#3
|
|
Asset
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jo Sul
It varies with employer on how this affects your job - some employers are very supportive and some really suck. If you work for one that sucks and you intend to stay in the guard then you either put up with it or find a new job. Of course you always have the option of becoming a "guard bum" with no real civilian job - just spend all your time working for the guard.
Most employers have no friggin idea what SF is so this doesn't matter. Of course if you feed them lines about being a "trained killer" they may think twice about screwing with your job. I've never had anyone be critical of SF to me (at least not to my face).
|
Jo Sul....
I would have to say that so far my employer has been supportive of my decision to re-enlist and I have not had to hold USERRA over their head. My only concern is that by the grace of God and my will I be selected for SF, then we are talking about a huge initial chunk of time away for trianing. My direct supervisor who is also an officer of the company has made mention that "SF would be an entire NEW career path for you". In subtle terms I am thinking they will try to dick me out of my job.
Last edited by Rschoeneck; 01-19-2005 at 08:28.
|
|
Rschoeneck is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 08:22
|
#4
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Williamston, SC
Posts: 2,018
|
If you are worried about it go active duty.
The Soldier, Sailoe, Airman's act is eventually going to be challenged in the courts. It was really meant to protect draftees and protecting "volunteers" is going to be challenged. Many companies no longer comply.
|
|
QRQ 30 is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 08:27
|
#5
|
|
Asset
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by QRQ 30
If you are worried about it go active duty.
The Soldier, Sailoe, Airman's act is eventually going to be challenged in the courts. It was really meant to protect draftees and protecting "volunteers" is going to be challenged. Many companies no longer comply. 
|
I figure it will only be a matter of time before they do change the law regarding "volunteering" for training, certainly will be a shame if and when they do. Wife and I are talking about going AD in the future, currently she is sitting on a pretty cushy gig with IBM that she is not yet willing to give up. So we reached a compromise, enlist in NG apply for SF, do a tour with the 20th, and then re-up with AD. Granted, these are all tentative plans at the moment. Who knows, like everything else IBM could outsource her position overseas.
|
|
Rschoeneck is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 09:04
|
#6
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,045
|
Here's another tract to consider. I saw an ad in the classifies here in Orlando where a guardsman put in the ad, "National Guardsman looking for XX type of work. Employer should understand that I can be called to active duty on short notice." It went on to explain his qualifications and so on. The local paper ran a short story on it and the guy wa picked up by a company here within 2 weeks. One that understood the implications of hiring a guardsman.
Just a thought.
__________________
"Are you listening or just waiting to talk?"
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
"Fate rarely calls upon us at a moment of our choosing."
Optimus Prime
|
|
Kyobanim is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 16:18
|
#7
|
|
Guerrilla Chief
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 819
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by QRQ 30
If you are worried about it go active duty.
The Soldier, Sailoe, Airman's act is eventually going to be challenged in the courts. It was really meant to protect draftees and protecting "volunteers" is going to be challenged. Many companies no longer comply. 
|
I've spoken with my boss about this and he told me that my company doesn't have to honor it. I don't know if it has to do with working for a contracting company or what, but he said that being picked up after any absence would depend on the needs of the company. So, I decided to make Active Duty my goal. =0)
--Aric
|
|
aricbcool is offline
|
|
01-19-2005, 16:54
|
#8
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 266
|
If you are a "contract" employee then all bets are off - employers use contract workers because their commitment is minimal.
Regular employees are a bit different - I think all the law requires is that the employer hold a job for them when they get back. They don't even have to do that for contract workers. Beyond that, anything the employer does is out of the goodness of their own heart.
__________________
"Excretion is the bitter part of valor."
|
|
Jo Sul is offline
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:48.
|
|
|