View Single Post
Old 06-22-2005, 08:59   #4
lksteve
Quiet Professional
 
lksteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Castle Rock, CO
Posts: 2,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
Do you think that particular cell would have been attacking (or planning to attack) us on our own soil rather than Iraqi soil had OIF not been ongoing?
what is the advantage to attacking us in Iraq rather than the US...? are they less conspicuous? do they have a better established support network? give it some thought...perhaps it's the call for jihad...maybe it's just easier...expand on your thought train...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Achilles
My logic is that a foreign national (from an allied country, like Britain for example) could more easily infiltrate into the US than someone of a more conspicuous origin (i.e. Syrian).
true...but riddle me this...why use Britain as a base to attack Americans involved with OIF...? why not use Syria, Jordan, why not use an in-theater safe zone? is the pressure we are exerting in Iraq causing mission planning to be directed outside theater? does this bode well or ill for our cause?????????????
__________________
""A man must know his destiny. if he does not recognize it, then he is lost. By this I mean, once, twice, or at the very most, three times, fate will reach out and tap a man on the shoulder. if he has the imagination, he will turn around and fate will point out to him what fork in the road he should take, if he has the guts, he will take it.""- GEN George S. Patton
lksteve is offline   Reply With Quote