[Airbornelawyer]

Originally Posted by JimP

Interestingly, I just spent an hour yesterday on a block of continuing legal education on AI. The presenter said she fed the parameters into the beast and it produced a very good legal brief in the format for that particular District. HOWEVER, it completely missed a recent key SC ruling that invalidated its entire argument. Brief value? Zero.

Similarly, when the kids and I were playing around with it some months ago, I fed a complex joint-base and inter-service issue I was working on into it and within a minute it put out a three page opinion with all the relevant AR's, AFI,s DoDI's, and DoDD's cited. All the individual pieces were correct, but the conclusion was 100% wrong. Like Grateful Citizen said, it could not incorporate certain baseline logic/axioms.

Be careful of this stuff....

Did you see the New York case where the lawyers used AI to write a motion to dismiss, and the AI just made up case citations out of whole cloth?