View Single Post
Old 09-03-2022, 11:09   #1608
Badger52
Area Commander
 
Badger52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western WI
Posts: 7,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by GratefulCitizen View Post
Preliminary injunction against the ATF “partial” frame and receiver rule:

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fir...pdf?1662145028
Outstanding! Thanks for that. (Now they can quit polishing that phrase "constructive intent" they used to toss about with abandon.)

A flavorful morsel from the Judge:
Quote:
ATF has no general authority to regulate weapon parts. But the Final Rule grants ATF that general authority by copying language used throughout the statutory definition. It takes phrases like “designed to” and “may readily be converted” and “assembled” from various places in the statute, cobbling them together to form ATF’s own definition of “firearm.” Those terms may add a patina of credibility to the drafting, but they tarnish Congress’s carefully crafted definition. More importantly, they unlawfully expand ATF’s authority beyond the boundaries set by the Gun Control Act.
__________________
"Civil Wars don't start when a few guys hunt down a specific bastard. Civil Wars start when many guys hunt down the nearest bastards."

The coin paid to enforce words on parchment is blood; tyrants will not be stopped with anything less dear. - QP Peregrino
Badger52 is offline   Reply With Quote