Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post - Protecting the Second Amendment

sfshooter · 01-06-2022, 09:33

I guess I read it differently. I presumed that the FFL would now have to give (provide) each buyer with a lock box/safe, which in turn would add another expense to the FFL holder.
I didn't look at it in the capitalist viewpoint

.
But then if the buyer has to buy said lock box then there is more expense for the buyer. All in all just more b.s. to jack with honest people for exercising their constitutional rights.

01-06-2022, 09:33	#1516
sfshooter Quiet Professional Join Date: Aug 2016 Location: Big Sky Posts: 444	I guess I read it differently. I presumed that the FFL would now have to give (provide) each buyer with a lock box/safe, which in turn would add another expense to the FFL holder. I didn't look at it in the capitalist viewpoint . But then if the buyer has to buy said lock box then there is more expense for the buyer. All in all just more b.s. to jack with honest people for exercising their constitutional rights. __________________ Exceptions are so inevitable that no rule is without them - except the one just stated. - Paso Por Aqui, by Eugene Manlove Rhodes "I ask you sir, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people........" George Mason
sfshooter is offline