Oh. A Reminder..
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...n%20Merits.pdf
FINALLY...
Respondents violated Petitioner’s Fourth Amendment rights when they seized him from his home, and then seized his guns from his bedroom and garage, all without a warrant.
The First Circuit held that Cady’s community caretaking exception—and that exception alone—justified Respondents’ actions. Pet. App. 11a, 30a, 37a. But that narrow exception to the warrant requirement applies only to automobiles,
and certainly does not extend to the home. See supra 14–16, 30–33. The First Circuit’s contrary conclusion is wrong.
CONCLUSION
The judgment below should be reversed
just saying ... will not happen to have warrantless gun searchs.