|
I certainly cant disagree with you.
I guess my intended point is the control of the threat of battlespace, before it begins, and not the application of employing them.
Strategies are numerous and can vary, so attempting to mitigate the vulnerability of the perceived future strategy is what the security systems are that are being developed. This is true for any history or country that has taken notice of the perceived threat of people.
Its incrementally improving the foxhole. While also assuring the adversaries capabilities are limited by controlling resources.
I am not convinced it's a grand conspiracy even if some political views lean one way or the other. I see it as the path its falling into if conventional or not. Because of this possibility I presume this is why we are seeing greater foriegn destabilization tactics employed against us.
Its several sources leveraging the indicators. Perhaps not even aware or interested in the same outcomes.
|