11-17-2018, 16:54
|
#16
|
|
Quiet Professional
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa
Posts: 2,633
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bandycpa
This honestly could work, but only if the standard is the actual standard required to complete the job and not just to allow people to pass. I mean this for all walks of life too. I earned my CPA not because someone thought I should get it, or because I came from a rural area, or because of any other perceive disadvantage I had that entitled me to get my designation. I earned it because I met a standard that our industry said I needed to meet to properly serve in my profession.
We have changed the perspective of the standard to mean what a person needs to pass a course, obtain a position, etc. The standard is what is needed for a job to get done, not to allow someone to claim a certification.
So, change the perspective on what the standard means, and suddenly gender doesn't matter anymore. You either meet the standard or you don't.
|
Per Bing;
Quote:
|
The number of CPA in the US in 2006 stands at 646,520, versus 639,628 in 2003.
|
So how many SF troops are there? Hint much less than that (less than 1% of that).
|
|
Joker is offline
|
|