View Single Post
Old 03-24-2015, 08:52   #1
JJ_BPK
Quiet Professional
 
JJ_BPK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 18 yrs upstate NY, 30 yrs South Florida, 20 yrs Conch Republic, now chasing G-Kids in NOVA & UK
Posts: 11,901
6.5 Grendel Project

A couple weeks ago, a HS friend ask for some help building his 1st AR.

I am bored and have persistent FABG, and this is a bad combo.

I have wanted an upper that spanned the gap between 5.56 to 50 Beowulf.

I spent 2 minutes looking at the AR10 7.62 route and just didn't get a warm fuzzy, besides I wanted to share one of my AR lowers.

Looked at the 7.62x39,, WHY when I have a good AK??

Looked at the 300 Blackout. It's a 30-30 squeezed into an AR.

That left the 6.8 SPC & 6.5 Grendel. Both are about the same, but I have a AA lower.

Used my google-foo on the various gun sites and have collected most all the parts.
  • AA Grendel upper
  • AA bolt
  • AA barrel, started at 22, cut to 17, sold @ good price.
  • Seekins SP3R keymod hand guard
  • misc bits, gas block, tube, carrier, etc

In the process I ran into another QP that has taken a shine to the 6.5..

REF: FAGB - FOG Addicted to Gun Buying

PS: In looking at the 300 blackout, I was tweaked by the fact that it is supported by sub-sonic factory ammo for use with a can.

Knowing that at best, it's a 30-30, I looked up the ballistics tables and looked for a comparable round.

The 300 Blackout in sub-sonic mode is equivalent to the Army .30 cal, M1 carbine, one of the most anemic rounds ever created.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2015-03-23 010.jpg (35.1 KB, 31 views)
File Type: jpg 2015-03-23 014.jpg (66.6 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg 12.4.jpg (79.7 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg 2015-03-23 012.jpg (95.3 KB, 27 views)
File Type: jpg 2015-03-23 001.jpg (62.1 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg 2015-03-24 003.jpg (62.4 KB, 37 views)
__________________
Go raibh tú leathuair ar Neamh sula mbeadh a fhios ag an diabhal go bhfuil tú marbh

"May you be a half hour in heaven before the devil knows you’re dead"
JJ_BPK is offline   Reply With Quote