Quote:
Originally Posted by Dozer523
Mandato(r)y gunlocks to prevent crazies and criminals from getting the guns of law-abiding citizens and unlimited liability for the damage done by 1) a gun owner who switches side(s) and becomes a crazy or a criminal and the damage done by a gun that a criminal gained access to from a legal owner because it was not properly locked.
|
That's actually not unreasonable. I can see a mess with regard to the classification process (definition of "crazy" and "criminal") and with legality regarding the lock system (does DHS get the spare key?), but- those solutions
could conceivably reduce the potentiality of the SH, Aurora and Columbine-style crimes.