Thread: Snipers in SF
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2009, 14:22   #49
wet dog
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimberly View Post
Criticality: How important, in a strategic context, is the target? What effect will its destruction have on other elements of the target system? Is it more important to have real-time surveillance of the target (e.g., a road junction) than its physical destruction?
Accessibility: Can an SR team reach or sense the target, keep it under surveillance for the appropriate time, and then exfiltrate after the target is struck?
Recuperability: When the target is destroyed by fire support or direct action, In the case of DA missions, can the enemy repair, replace, or bypass it quickly, minimum resources? If so, it may not be a viable target.
Vulnerability: do SR (including DA) and supporting units have the capability to destroy the target?
Effect: Beyond pure military effect are the political, economic, legal, and psychological effects of destroying the target? How would the attack affect local civilians?
Recognizability: Can the target be recognized clearly, by SR and attack forces, under the prevailing weather, light, and in its terrain? If there are critical points within the target, they also must be recognizable by the means of destruction used.
(WIKI)

And I'm a girl...
That was pretty good...

Do you remember how this thread was started? ...do all SFer's go through sniper training?,...then it morphed into "18Bs" seem the obvious choice, then for awhile we badgered one another, in fun for the most part.

Has it become more clear that SF missions seem to be strategic in nature.

I beleive this thread has exhausted itself. Shooting and target questions are covered elsewhere.

Good day,

Last edited by wet dog; 10-08-2009 at 15:52.
  Reply With Quote