|
I think my post is being taken out of context for one thing I stated, and then ignored for the point I was trying to make. I was asked about it's possibility to produce MOA performance, which it does. I never said the Krink would equal a 16" velocity. I said "Near" I only mentioned the back pressure of the Krink to explain why the 10" barrel which is famous for being problematic, is so reliable with Noveske systems, along with it's polygonal rifling. If I hadn't mentioned that, I'm sure someone would have commented quickly about SBRs inherant unreliability. When using the 62gr SS109 from a standard 16" barrel velocity is approx 2989fps. The 10" standard barel is approx 2627fps. A difference of just 327fps. If the Krink and polygonal rifling used together create a back pressure sufficient enough to raise velocity by just 100fps, wouldnt you consider that to be "NEAR" 16" barrel velocity??? After all, you must remember, it does function flawlessly, cycling the bolt on a system designed for 16 - 20" barrels, using ammunition designed for 16 - 20" barrels without gas problems which are associated to SBRs and low velocity.
|