View Single Post
Old 05-08-2004, 23:33   #33
danjam
Auxiliary
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 87
Although Hoepoe and I disagree on the status of the WB or the politics about it, I think we agree fully that the wall is a necessary thing. This is not covering the full impact of the wall and all who live within or without it. In other words we are, I shall speak for myself.. I am blatantly bias.

Taking into mind that the "wall" will become most certainly (in my opinion) a border, this can only help "peace" become more of a reality since there is something on the ground, physically helping it. Once it is there, you cannot ignore it.

Professionaly speaking, once it is up and the security systems are in place, well, I don't know what type of systems you guys have say on the Mexican border, (if you know then good if no, then :-) ) here our systems are quite good, and work rather well. It saves lives and this is the whole aim of the "wall". Each time there is an attack, the mention of whether there was or was not a "wall" is a large factor.
danjam is offline   Reply With Quote