Professional Soldiers ® - View Single Post

JLF · 05-29-2007, 20:56

We're running with the 4MOA version on some of our ACOG/M4's too (Operator preference) and it works well enough with us. IMHO for a weapon that will double duty to allow you some standoff magnification and allow for closer in engagement (ala JPoint in a close fight e.g. CQB ECT.) the 4MOA is a good compromise.

Again for clarity, I recommend the 4MOA for standoff to close fighting (in that order). If your weapon system will be primarily used for the close fight such CQB then I would recommend the 8MOA for faster "close-in" target aquisition. Everything is a tradeoff.

Hope this helps (YMMV),

JLF

05-29-2007, 20:56	#2
JLF Asset Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Tucson, AZ. Posts: 19	We're running with the 4MOA version on some of our ACOG/M4's too (Operator preference) and it works well enough with us. IMHO for a weapon that will double duty to allow you some standoff magnification and allow for closer in engagement (ala JPoint in a close fight e.g. CQB ECT.) the 4MOA is a good compromise. Again for clarity, I recommend the 4MOA for standoff to close fighting (in that order). If your weapon system will be primarily used for the close fight such CQB then I would recommend the 8MOA for faster "close-in" target aquisition. Everything is a tradeoff. Hope this helps (YMMV), JLF
JLF is offline