Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mugwump
...or am I shaking with adrenaline, pointing a G23 at my son with my finger on trigger, because the only light I have is attached to a weapon?
An honestly friendly hint: stating that a weapon light without training is a liability is not the same as advocating "...shooting at a shadow in the dark..." You can stake out a position around here if it's based upon personal, relevant and informed experience, but your stay will be short if you put words into a QP's mouth.
|
Why is Reaper's good post being spammed with a dogpile?
How am I "putting words" in anyones mouth?
I said,
Quote:
|
"while I agree that a tricked out M4 "may in some localities...CALI, DC..." be somewhat a liability in home defense, I do not think there is any evidence to a person ever being convicted mearly because of this, without serious underlying issues"
|
Because I believe this is a myth that has been perpetuated too long, We have all heard it, but I do not believe anyone can site a single case where someone has been wrongly convicted of manslaughter in a home defense senario just because of the type of weapon used, or if they used certain ammo...etc
You may attract more suspicion, but if the facts are in your corner and you are not breaking the law otherwise, use any legal firearm you want.