Quote:
Originally posted by NousDefionsDoc
You can't ever get everyone to agree, hence the 80% solution, but I think in this case, the admin could do better than what they have with a little change in delivery.
Sorry, I missed this somehow. Well, according to the chants of those not on board, the context of the discussion on Iraq was WMD. Since WMD has not been produced, they feel vindicated. Granted, there will always be a point of contention, if not WMD then something else. granted, alot of this is about the man, not the situaiton. Granted, their point is invalid as far as I'm concerned. I think he had them and I think we will find them.
My point is, how did WMD become the context of the discussion?
Now, this is pretty much the way it went. Except for a couple of groups. You can't sell WMD to the left, because they don't think anybody but the US would ever actually use them. The message never changed in the example. Just the focus on a cause.
|
You sold me, Doc.
I like your logic.
TR
__________________
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat." - President Theodore Roosevelt, 1910
De Oppresso Liber 01/20/2025
|