Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Reaper
First, you need to do some reading here and introduce yourself in the proper place. Since you were referred here by CPTAUSRET, we will skip the prrliminary ass-chewing and ask that you do that at your earliest opportunity. It does indicate a potential problem with SA and attention to detail.
I would say that reattending depends on whether you think the deficiency noted is a fluke, a temporary issue, or a permanent one.
For example, you can improve your education, but not your basic intelligence. If your SARS issue was a bad decision and you think you might do better next time, come back. If you do not understand the difference between right and wrong, we can't help you and it would be a waste of time.
Almost invariably, IMHO, the cadre outbrief each stud and tell him what he did right, what he did wrong, whether he should come back, and what he needs to work on before he does. Did that not happen with you?
TR
|
TR,
I have corrected my mistake. My apologies. No excuse.
I did participate in an outbriefing by an assessor, and was clearly told where I failed. He was unsure if this would hurt my chances in the future, however.
It was not a moral issue. I acted too aggressively. However, the assessor did not know if the psychologist identified this as ingrained (permanent personality trait) or simply a poor judgement call (temporary bad decision). I believe I simply made a bad judgement call. I was unable to confirm this with the psych, however, since we had a pretty heated interview.
I hope this clarifies. Thank you for your time and advice.