Thread: Xm - 8
View Single Post
Old 04-04-2004, 01:08   #15
brownapple
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally posted by DanUCSB
That's where I'm conflicted, really. I have read the study--and to me, it highlights the need for training. I'd rather carry the weight of one 7.62 round that hits target area, rather than five 5.56 rounds that don't, y'know?
There have been failures to stop from the 7.62mm NATO round, the old .30-06, and even the .50 BMG. Even with highly trained troops, a large portion of the ammunition expended in certain tactical situations is not into targets (suppressive fire or other uses). Reducing the number of rounds that can be carried is not a viable solution in my opinion. It is definitely not a viable option on an Army wide basis (read Citizen Soldiers by Ambrose - the number of situations where soldiers ran low or out of ammunition is striking).
  Reply With Quote