![]() |
Be honest: Who actually read FM 3-24? - Starbuck Is Wrong
An interesting debate - COINtra, COINdinista, or... :confused:
Be honest: Who actually read FM 3-24? WingsOverIraq, 9 Jul 2011 http://wingsoveriraq.com/2011/07/09/...-read-fm-3-24/ Starbuck Is Wrong LineOfDeparture, 12 Jul 2011 http://www.lineofdeparture.com/2011/...buck-is-wrong/ And so it goes... Richard :munchin |
Nah... still trying to get through that 7-8 one.. :D
Thanks for the links, Richard. MTF. |
I had to review 3-24 when I worked in DOTD at SWC before I retired. Also, drafted TC 31-24 (SF Advisor Handbook) and, after I retired, helped draft FM 3-07.1 (Security Force Assistance). The Army NEVER understood, nor does it understand, insurgency or anything related to it. They never will. Any opinion SWC had was completely disregarded. Nagle was a career Armor officer who happened to study it (like a million others) and said all the right things at the right time. I work with the Regular Army right now and I am truly amazed that they get anything done as conventional minded as they are. For them, the term "out of the box"is a cliche that they dropped (alot) but never really got what it meant.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 21:01. |
Copyright 2004-2022 by Professional Soldiers ®