![]() |
Not breaking news to us, but...
...here it is anyway:
link Quote:
|
I wrote to the AP after that article asking them where they got the $60, 000 figure. The closest any 18 year soldier comes to that figure is and E-8 or 9 at 18 years. I let them know that it would not be fair to say that these folks are all getting out for the money, some of them are leaving for the freedom of choosing the types of work and when they want to work, etc. While the money is definitely better, the whole article had an officer's slant to it. The amounts quoted were not what the average E-5 or E_6 would be making. Also, who in there right mind would get out at 18 years?? Why not stick it out for two more years and get that second check plus the benefits of retirement.
I guess I thought there were too many seeming falacies in the way the story was written. Makes it look to the GP that soldiers are rolling in dough. :rolleyes: |
Quote:
Standard 7th Group reply. |
Quote:
|
Fine--but that does not mean that he is not correct.
And since when is a 7th Group mindset wrong? :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I watched on CSPAN last night a rebroadcast of the hearings where CSM Hall, Chief Breining and the others testified. Some fluff, some interesting commentary, an attempt by the Democratic congresswoman who represents Coronado to score political points.
One thing I recall. CSM Hall noted that in both physical fitness standards and language standards, one problem is that the public education system is no longer producing the same caliber of recruit, so more has to be done at the beginning of the pipeline. Foreign languages and PE are pretty much electives in too many high schools. On the other end, he noted that some of the bad things you hear about pay, family separation and the like are coming from retention surveys of people getting out, so they may be an unrepresentative sample. The AFSOC Chief Master Sergeant did note that for his people, one big complaint wasn't the high optempo, but a lack of optempo at times which led to AFSOC assets being allocated to non-AFSOC missions (e.g., MC-130s shuttling supplies between Kuwait and Baghdad). Chief Breining echoed that, saying a problem in the SEAL community was not enough missions, not too many. On PMCs, they all noted that market forces drive pay, and stated that the SOF community has good relations with the PMCs, who fill a role that otherwise SOCOM might have to task assets to. They seemed to be going out of their way not to give the Democratic members ammunition to demonize PMCs. One of the committee members, Tom Kline, is a retired Marine colonel who once carried the "football", so it was nice to hear a Congressman who spoke the language of soldiers rather than politicians (even if he was - gasp! - an officer). |
I wish we had CSpan.
|
AL:
Excellent post, good info. Not sure that all the sources cited were sufficiently well-informed on the situation, specifically on the ARSOF side. TR |
Quote:
Terry |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Terry |
Not unless he ALSO has bayonet wounds.
:) |
Quote:
Thank you, Brother. Terry:) |
Quote:
TR |
Quote:
That's funny!!:D Terry |
Okay, Seeing as I don't understand exactly why NDD wants an apology....here.....I apologize as per your PM. I am sending one back.
|
Let me see if I can explain it.
"the whole article had an officer's slant to it." What is an officer's slant? Do they get together every year at the Officer's Secret Meeting to Plot Against the Troops (OSMTPAT) and have the Slant Committee put forth slant ideas and then vote on the Officer's Slant for the Year? (OSY04) Is it a secret or open ballot? Officers are among those leaving. That is a baseless comment painting a large and diverse group with a very broad brush. IMO of course. |
Quote:
They know! |
So that's where you guys go at 1600 every Friday.....sip brandy, smoke cigars and plot on the enlisted man eh?:D
|
It's even on the ROTC syllabus...
|
this is why I was such a terrible officer.
I was still a sergeant at heart. :) |
Quote:
|
Brother, thanks for the vote of confidence....but, I suck.
I know it, and spend my days trying to be a better man. It is ok. I have met some folks who suck worse than I do. It gives me hope that maybe I am making some progress. If nothing else, I am not in denial. And I am working on it. :) Back on topic, though, the moment that I realized that I was not like the other officers in my 18A course was when I looked inside and knew that I would not stab my classmates in the back to get the Buck. Those fuckers were brutal! No loyalty. Well....ok. Some loyalty. Until rating time rolled around. I blame the rating system with the "top-block." Some of those guys would do anything to get that top-block. Lie, cheat or steal?Hah. Some of those guys lied, cheated, and in one fashion or another, engaged in outright thievery. We had one guy, a guy who was actually pretty fucking cool named Lee, who wore a Ranger tab throughout the entire course. The day before graduation, he was unmasked as a poser. He never graduated Ranger school. Well, the schmoes who were running SWC at that time let the muldoon graduate. Yup. He commanded an ODA. Fuck that. But it really happened. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35. |
Copyright 2004-2026 by Professional Soldiers ®