![]() |
No, I'm not suggesting anything. I am asking you a yes or no question. I want to know what you think.
|
Quote:
|
Thank you. Damn sacamuelas, it was like pulling teeth!:D
|
Welcome to MY life!! LOL
NOw I am just waiting for Guy to knock my teeth out for calling him crazy in the other thread!! :eek: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd say that some people are born with a genetic predisposition towards homosexuality.
Otherwise, the onus is on the environment and I'm no behaviourist, so I'm not about to believe that the environment (while a significant factor in development) is entirely the cause of homosexuality. Interesting discussion. Solid |
x
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I bet you have that on a Tshirt in your "closet" you live in!!! |
LOL
x
|
Re: LOL
Quote:
|
Re: Re: LOL
x
|
I'm with NDD on this.
I could care less what they do. I just don't like them pushing their type of lifestyle on others and in turn deny the average person their freedoms.
I definitely HATE the comparison of the gay movement as compared to the civil rights movement...that shit pisses me off! Am I a HOMOPHOBE?That's what I have been called before! The answer is NO! "I just don't like being around your type...that doesn't mean I fear you". |
Well,
I agree about comparing it with the civil rights movement. That's ridiculous. As far as the environmental vs genetic - I don't know, but I don't think its genetic. And DD, I don't think I agree with you about it being biological but not genetic. The way I see it, if its biological its either genetic or you catch it like a disease. If its biological, why are there more gays and bis in Brazil than anywhere else in LATAM? And no, they don't move there, they are Brazilian. I don't know for sure, but I think it is more choice than anything else, but that doesn't explain the urge that some apparently have. If it is genetic, I think that changes a lot, at least for me as far as their "rights" go. I also don't like them shoving their lifestyle in everybody's faces nor the attempt to make it "normal". Its not normal. It my not be an aberation of nature, but its definitely not the standard. I also don't care what they do, but the public sillyness needs to stop. They have chosen to define themselves by that, not me. And if that's the way they're going to define themselves, by sexuality, I don't want them around my kids or in my Army. When I went in the Army and they ask me who I am, I didn't define myself by saying "I am heterosexual." Its stupid to define yourself by an activity that you do four hours a day 5 times a week. Or in sacamuela's case, once a year on his birthday. Whether its hetero or homo sexual. I am also not a phobe. And I couldn't care less what they do in the privacy of their own homes. But they can't leave it at that and it will cause problems. I think this marriage thing could be a bigger deal than a lot of people think. Look at what happened when we let women have the vote.:lifter LOL |
Re: I'm with NDD on this.
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 23:22. |
Copyright 2004-2026 by Professional Soldiers ®